0.09/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 1920 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 240 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 03:36:04 EDT 2025 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.44 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bAnQSiQver/E---3.1_12737.p 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNHSN. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 1200s (5) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 240s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh2l with 240s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # sh2l with pid 12821 completed with status 0 0.17/0.46 # Result found by sh2l 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNHSN. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 1200s (5) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 240s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh2l with 240s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 0.17/0.46 # Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SHSFMFBN 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh3 with 130s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # sh3 with pid 12825 completed with status 0 0.17/0.46 # Result found by sh3 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLMNHSN. 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 1200s (5) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 240s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh2l with 240s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 0.17/0.46 # Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SHSFMFBN 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh3 with 130s (1) cores 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.17/0.46 0.17/0.46 # Proof found! 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Theorem 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_23, type, leibeq: ($o > $o > $o) > ($o > $o > $o) > $o). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_24, type, epred1_0: ($o > $o > $o) > $o). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_25, type, epred2_0: $o > $o > $o). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: $o). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_27, type, esk2_0: $o). 0.17/0.46 thf(decl_29, type, epred3_0: $o). 0.17/0.46 thf(leibeq, axiom, ((leibeq)=(^[X1:$o > $o > $o, X2:$o > $o > $o]:(![X3:($o > $o > $o) > $o]:(((X3 @ X1)=>(X3 @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bAnQSiQver/E---3.1_12737.p', leibeq)). 0.17/0.46 thf(conj, conjecture, (leibeq @ $and @ (^[X4:$o, X5:$o]:(~((~((X5))|~((X4))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bAnQSiQver/E---3.1_12737.p', conj)). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_2, plain, ((leibeq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$o > $o > $o, Z1:$o > $o > $o]:(![X3:($o > $o > $o) > $o]:(((X3 @ Z0)=>(X3 @ Z1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[leibeq])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(![X6:($o > $o > $o) > $o]:(((X6 @ $and)=>(X6 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(~((~(Z1)|~(Z0))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])]), c_0_2])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ $and)&~(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$o, Z1:$o]:(~((~(Z1)|~(Z0))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X9:$o, X8:$o]:(((epred2_0 @ X8 @ X9)<=>~((~((X9))|~((X8)))))), introduced(definition)). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((((epred1_0 @ epred2_0))=(($true)))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]), c_0_5])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ epred2_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ $and), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_9, plain, (($and)!=(epred2_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X10:$o, X11:$o]:(((((X10)|~(epred2_0 @ X11 @ X10))&((X11)|~(epred2_0 @ X11 @ X10)))&(~(X10)|~(X11)|(epred2_0 @ X11 @ X10)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[])])])])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_11, plain, (((esk1_0)&(esk2_0))<~>(epred2_0 @ ((esk1_0)) @ ((esk2_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_12, plain, (epred2_0 @ (($true)) @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_13, plain, ((epred3_0)|(esk2_0)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_14, plain, ((epred3_0)|(esk1_0)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_15, plain, (~((esk1_0))|~((esk2_0))|~((epred3_0))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_16, plain, (epred3_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]), c_0_12])]), c_0_13]), c_0_14])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X5:$o]:(~((epred2_0 @ ((X5)) @ (~($true))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_18, plain, (~((esk1_0))|~((esk2_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X5:$o]:(~((epred2_0 @ (~($true)) @ ((X5))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_20, plain, ~((esk1_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]), c_0_17]), c_0_16])]), c_0_18])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_21, plain, ~((esk2_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]), c_0_19]), c_0_16])]), c_0_20])). 0.17/0.46 thf(c_0_22, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]), c_0_17]), c_0_16])]), c_0_21]), c_0_20]), ['proof']). 0.17/0.46 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 3 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 5 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 29 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 2 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 1 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 25 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 2 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 4 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 72 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 44 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 2 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 3 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.17/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 33 0.17/0.46 # ...of those cached : 30 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 12 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 8 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 93 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 13 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2406 0.17/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 104 0.17/0.46 0.17/0.46 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.004 s 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.001 s 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.005 s 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1836 pages 0.17/0.46 0.17/0.46 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.005 s 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.008 s 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages 0.17/0.46 % E exiting 0.17/0.46 % E exiting 0.17/0.46 EOF